Posted by: bwana | March 13, 2007

Why John Chichester’s Retirement is Good for Virginia

As noted in the blogosphere and in the WaPo, State Senator John Chichester yesterday announced he would not run for reelection to the Virginia State Senate.

john-chichester.jpg

 There have been a variety of reactions, from ”about time” to “the sky is falling”.  I will say this about John Chichester.  He has always gone his way, and his way has always infuriated someone.  After all, this is the guy who abstained on the ERA vote in 1980 to prevent a tie vote at 20 which would allow Chuck Robb to cast a deciding 21st vote for the constitutional amendment.  I am sure that the same folks who now complain about his tax plans would have given him high fives and kudos for his in your face tactics back in the day.

Agree or disagree with him, The Chich knew his mind and what he wanted to do.  Senator Chichester always sailed by his own compass,  charted his own course, and accepted the cheers and the jeers that attended him.  He kept the faith, and did not waffle.  It is unfortunate that he chose to antagonize rather than reason with his counter parts in the House of Delegates, but his announcement yesterday struck a positive tone that compares well to the farewell rant from Russ Potts.

I hope John Chichester finds satisfaction in his career, happiness in his retirement, and that he is able to help his wife Karen continue her recovery from her 2002 stroke.

****************

By the same token, I suggest that this retirement is a good thing for Virginia.  A two party system, even using a big tent philosophy, requires two parties with distinct philosophies to be successful.  The last seven years has seen a serious drift from that concept.  The GOP and the Democrats have not declared what they stand for and then gone toe to toe on issues during recent elections. Instead, we have the majority of the GOP favoring position X, Chichester using his position as Senate Finance Chair and President Pro Temp of the Senate (both of which he had by virtue of his seniority and membership in the GOP) to push position Y, and the Democrats making vague mumblings of glittering generalities without offering specifics…a/k/a Position ???? .  The Democrats instead chose to draft on the Chichester proposals and hope the GOP dashed themselves on the rocks of intra-party intransigence, leaving Virginians so annoyed with the lack of progress that they would someday return a democratic majority.

This past year Democrats from Brian Moran to Dick Saslaw and The Gov constantly talk about commited sources and revenue streams, but they have not offered a real plan.  My delegate Dave Marsden is a good example. As noted in earlier RR posts, in consecutive issues of the Burke Connection Dave Marsden went on about what was needed and everyone was in agreement except for the GOP philistines in the House of Delegates.  Then a plan came out, and Marsden voted for it…oh, reluctantly to be sure, but he voted for it…and suddently we don’t hear so much about how to attack TRAMOB problems, because he and the Democrats have no real plan to offer.   But of course we knew that, or else The Gov would not be out and about trying to figure out what to offer up in his veto message.

Chichester’s retirement will force both parties to create a position on TRAMOB.  This issue is the major one facing the Commonwealth, and no longer can the Democrats hide behind Chichester’s seniority.  They will have to move from generalities to specifics, and actually create legislation to offer to the public.  By the same token, without Chichester and his seniority and chutzpah the Gang of Five-Four-now Three will face more pressure to join in a consensus GOP position.  Meanwhile, the GOP majority in the House of Delegates and the bulk of the Senate will no longer be able to moan about being bushwhacked by Chichester’s undermining their positions and refusing to meet with them.  The Va GOP delegation will have to take responsibility for being a true majority party, and not one hampered by a vocal and powerful splinter element.

John Chichester, no matter how gifted and combative a legislator he was, hampered two party government in Virginia.  He obstructed one party, and by doing so enabled the other party to do less than it should if it really wanted to lead.  His devotion to Virginia will be missed; his hamstringing of the legislative process will not.

It’s a new day out there…and I hope both the Virginia Republicans and the Virginia Democrats are equal to the task.


Responses

  1. I have to say that I disagree. The people do not benefit from having idealogues on both sides that are unwilling to compromise in order to get things done. Ultimately, doing what’s best for Virginia should override politics. Polarizing positions do not move us towards that goal.

  2. I don’t disagree with your position…but I would suggest that Chichester, given his unwillingness to compromise even a little bit, also is an ideologue. He is more concerned with “his plans” than making something happen. He was more concerened with being right than with getting through even a portion of this plan…and in doing so he prevents a real head to head between the parties that the public could use to choose who we really want running things.

    I look at it this way…

    In a normal business or political situation, you would see leaders or parties work through this process:
    a) Point A is where we are;
    b) Point Z is where we want to go;
    c) Here is why we think we should go there and;
    d) Here is how we will make it happen.

    Here is what we have:
    On Point A: Neither the Democrats, the GOP, or Chichester bothers to give anything beyond a recitation of ills, rather than analysis of what we can do currently.
    On Point B: None of the three offers a vision or a destination
    On Point C: None of the three tries to support their vision, which is just as well as they have not elocuted one, and
    On Point D: The GOP want to get there with as little tax increase as possible, Chichester wants to get there with a tax increase while running a surplus, and the Democrats offer no plan, but will back one of the other options.

    Ultimately, No one is saying where we are, no one is saying where they want to lead, no one tries to offer a vision for the state, but all want or are at least willing to raise more revenue to get there.

    Chichester’s insistence on his way or the highway meant a GOP that could not create a unified vision and a Democratic party that chose not to form a unified vision, instead waiting for the GOP to implode and forfeit majority status

    With Chichester retired, the GOP can no longer blame him and the Democrats can no longer hide behind him. That means that both parties will have to assume and stand positions that the public will get behind, or else they will be defeated. There can be no more Chichester and Potts. These resignations are going to force each party to stand up and stand for something more than being reelected…and I think that is good for Virginia.

  3. vjp – While I agree with the proposition that politicians need to compromise to get things done, I also am glad to see John Chichester leaving. Like bwana, I believe Chichester helped the Democratic Party avoid taking a definitive position.

    In addition to what bwana offered, I offer this reason. Chichester is one of those politicians whose appetite for taxes can not be sated.

    The state of Virginia gets enough of our money. Because of the concentration of high salaries in NoVA (and high cost of living), the state pumps NoVA like a cash cow and spends the money elsewhere. This behavior pits one region of state against the rest. That is an inappropriate role for government and highly unethical. Moreover, this milking of one region for the benefit of another region leads to polarized positions.

    As good citizens, we should work to avoid being divided by our leaders. Chichester departure can only help to make that task easier.

  4. My comment really is to further Citizens Tom comments in that, the regional politics started many years ago. When I worked down there, I saw more regional fights then Dem vs. Rep. Especially, when it comes to public funding for education. I have heard more than one Speaker and Majority Leader say (and it didn’t matter which party they belonged) say that the reason the schools are better in Northern Virginia is that the people of NoVa are willing to pay for them and if they are willing to pay for them, why should my constituents! This still goes on today, Northern Virginia pays enough!
    So far as Senator Chichester, I wish him well in his retirement and thank him for his service to ALL Virginians.
    Time to move on folks!! Decisions are made by serious people who show up!
    Bwana Fan In Vienna

  5. Dear Bwana and Citizen Tom,
    You are both correct on Chichester’s obstinacy giving the Dems. some cover. Virginia has long been a “porkchop” state where the rural areas control the urban and suburban parts of the state. This means No.Va. gets sucked dry of our tax revenue with nothing to show, including no transportation dollars.

    Just take a look at the mulit-billion dollar Route 58 highway project rammed through by the late Dem. Speaker of the House, A.L. Philpott. With Northern Va. money, Philpott built a multi-lane highway from Norfork to Bristol, Va. paralleling Virginia’s southern border, when at the time, Des Moines,Ia. had more limited access lanes of travel into and out of it than Washington, D.C. Philpott and his Southside Economic Development Commission ruled Richmond and the Democratically controlled House and Senate treated every Republican proposal like dirt. “Porkchopism” to the max.

    If we are not careful with our redistricting, we could wind up with “urban progressives” taking over the state. See:”From ‘Porkchoppers’ to ‘Lambchoppers’: The Passage of Florida’s Public Employee’s Relations Act”,Industrial and Labor Review, Vol.44, No.2,pp349-366.

    I disagree with Vjp, in that idealogues for either party are what controls the eventual movement of the state, right or left, and as such are fine. But what we need more of is good old fashioned political civility, as exemplified by Sen. Chuck Colgan. I agree with him on few issues. But when Pilpott and crew were absolutely riding rough-shod over every Republican in Richmond. Colgan treated folks with kindness and respect which is, in my opinion, one reason why Sen. Colgan had the favor returned to him, when we took control away from the
    Democrats.

    What I disagree with is abject zealotry over reasoned civility. It might be too much to hope for in Richmond, but it sure would make the state run a whole lot smoother

  6. [...] Why John Chichesters Retirement is Good for <b>Virginia</b> [...]

  7. [...] Talking Points #7: Sophistpundit with New Media Economics #8: Renaissance Ruminations with Why John Chichester’s Retirement is Good for Virginia #9: VB Dems #10: Badrose with The Face that Launched a Blog Conference #11: I’m Not Emeril [...]

  8. Great information, stay well


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories